RETROSPECTIVE RECORD · PREPARED 16 SEPTEMBER 2026The archive · 200 retrospective records ↗

The archive / Tools & vendors

Tools & vendors / Operating entry · Entry note · prepared 16 September 2026

CloudAMQP's free RabbitMQ plan caps connections at twenty

CloudAMQP's own plans page sets its free tier's queue, message and connection ceilings and the price step above them.

Visual for this record: cloudamqp-rabbitmq-hosting-pricing-and-connection-limits
Visual published by cloudamqp.com, shown for identification of the record. Credit: cloudamqp.com · source page ↗ Rights: owner-review-pending.

The workload

Hosting RabbitMQ instead of running it directly means checking a managed vendor's own connection and queue ceilings before wiring an application to it. CloudAMQP's plans page, retrieved 16 September 2026, states those ceilings for its free tier by name; the workload is reading them before, not after, hitting a connection refusal in production.

What the documents show

CloudAMQP's plans page states, verified, that its free 'Little Lemur' plan is limited to a maximum of 100 queues, a maximum of 10,000 queued messages, a 20-connection limit, a 1 million message-per-month quota, a 28-day maximum idle-queue time, and runs on a shared RabbitMQ broker, all at $0. The next paid tier, 'Tough Tiger,' verified, raises those ceilings to 1,000 queues, 100,000 queued messages, 100 connections, and 10 million messages per month, for $19 per month, still on a shared broker. Both are described as multi-tenant plans for development or small hobby projects, distinct from CloudAMQP's dedicated plans, which start at $50 per month for a single node with a benchmarked 500 messages-per-second throughput and 1,500 connections. CloudAMQP's own FAQ documentation adds, verified, that moving from a shared plan to a dedicated one is not a simple in-place upgrade for RabbitMQ brokers specifically: the FAQ states that migrating 'from a shared to a dedicated plan is not supported directly via Edit' for RabbitMQ, and recommends queue federation instead, whereas its newer LavinMQ broker option supports a direct migration through the console.

The operating cost

The free tier costs $0 per month but is capped at the 20-connection, 1-million-message ceiling stated above, verified. Moving to Tough Tiger costs a flat $19 per month for the stated 100-connection, 10-million-message ceiling, verified. Moving beyond that to a dedicated single node costs $50 per month, verified, at which point throughput is described as benchmarked rather than shared and best-effort. CloudAMQP's pages state these three price points directly; no further calculation is needed to compare them, since all three are flat monthly, or free, rates rather than usage-metered.

The stop condition

The plans page states hard stop conditions for the free tier: 20 simultaneous connections and 10,000 queued messages on Little Lemur, or 100,000 once on Tough Tiger — a queue that backs up past that ceiling has nowhere to put new messages under the stated limits. The FAQ's migration guidance implies a second, less obvious stop condition: because RabbitMQ brokers cannot move from shared to dedicated with a simple in-place edit, the point to plan a queue-federation migration is before the connection or queue ceiling is hit, not after, since the migration itself takes deliberate setup rather than a button click.

  • Does current peak connection count sit comfortably under 20, or is it already approaching the free tier's ceiling?
  • If migrating off the shared plan becomes necessary, has the queue-federation path been tested in advance?
  • Would the jump from $19 to $50 per month be justified by the workload's actual throughput today?

This entry documents CloudAMQP's hosting terms only; the separate question of what licence governs the RabbitMQ server software itself is not addressed here.

Sources & reading trail

CloudAMQP Plans ↗

States the free and next-tier RabbitMQ plan limits and prices, and the dedicated single-node starting price.

Source published: Not established · Retrieved: 16 September 2026

CloudAMQP FAQ ↗

States that RabbitMQ shared-to-dedicated migration is not a direct in-place upgrade, unlike LavinMQ.

Source published: Not established · Retrieved: 16 September 2026

Vendor documentation, regulator records and founder-published documents establish the entry; the workload reading and the stop condition are Solo Product Office editorial analysis. This retrospective draft does not imply the site published on the event date.